CPS Case: In re K.F., et al: (All 5 of Mother’s children returned on the first hearing): The client, a mother of five biological children and one stepchild, faced serious accusations of physical abuse against her stepchild, who was already involved in a CPS case. As a result, CPS decided to remove all of her children from her care. Seeking help, the client reached out to Walter Shaw at Shaw 3 Law Firm. During the very first court hearing, the judge ruled in her favor, ordering the return of all her children to her custody. The client was extremely relieved and satisfied with this outcome.
NO PRISON TIME, AND ONLY DOING PROBATION AND COMMUNITY SERVICE OVER THE WEEKEND: People v. N.G: Client faced charges for felony evasion of police while exceeding 100 MPH and causing a traffic collision. The Prison Terms he was facing was a minimum of 16 months in prison, 2 years in prison or max 3 years in prison. The client engaged and reached out to Walter Shaw with Shaw 3 Law Firm for representation. Mr. Shaw came onto the case and negotiated with the district attorney, ultimately securing probation for the client without any prison time, instead requiring 90 days of community service on weekends. The client was pleased with this outcome.
CASE DISMISSED. People v. R.K: Our client, an investment banker at a leading American firm, found himself facing a first-time DUI that threatened his professional licenses and career. Concerned about the potential consequences, he reached out to Walter Shaw at Shaw 3 Law Firm for assistance.
After carefully reviewing the case, Mr. Shaw determined that going to trial was the best course of action, as the client had everything to lose with any plea deal. With unwavering dedication, Mr. Shaw prepared for trial, and before it commenced, the District Attorney dismissed the case entirely.
In re Nouwels., et al (The court dismissed the father’s allegation and granted full authorization for liberalized visitation and expedited reunification with his children):
CPS initiated a case against the father based on allegations of domestic violence and a history of prior child welfare referrals from 2015-2020, including a family maintenance case in 2020. The department argued that the father’s past failures to benefit from offered services posed a potential risk of physical or emotional harm to the child. However, these allegations were unfounded.
The father sought legal representation from Walter Shaw of Shaw 3 Law Firm, who made significant strides in the case. Mr. Shaw successfully argued for the dismissal of the prior child welfare referral allegation, demonstrating that it lacked relevance to the current case and did not present a current risk of harm. The department concurred, leading to the dismissal of this allegation.
In addition, during only the second court hearing, Mr. Shaw achieved a substantial victory by securing full authorization for liberalized visitation and return for the father. This decision is expected to facilitate a quicker reunification with his children. The father was greatly relieved and pleased with these outcomes, as they represent a significant step towards reuniting with his children more swiftly.
In re Lucero., et al (Mother’s allegation dismissed): The case involved a mother being wrongly implicated due to the negligent actions of the father, who allegedly drove under the influence with their child and caused a car accident. The mother was unaware of the father’s substance abuse and learned about the accident only later. Despite the father’s admission to law enforcement that he had concealed his substance abuse from the mother, DCFS filed a petition against her for failing to protect the child. Walter Shaw of Shaw 3 Law Firm intervened, presenting evidence to County Counsel that disproved the mother’s alleged failure to protect. Both the County Counsel and the judge agreed with Mr. Shaw’s arguments, leading to the dismissal of all the allegations against the mother. The client was extremely satisfied with Mr. Shaw’s successful defense.
In re R.S, (The maternal great-grandmother was awarded legal guardianship of her great-granddaughter, leading to the successful closure of the case.): The client was granted De Facto Parent status for her great-granddaughter in a Los Angeles County DCFS case. To further advocate for her rights, the client enlisted the help of Walter Shaw from Shaw 3 Law Firm. Mr. Shaw was instrumental in obtaining legal guardianship and effectively resolving the DCFS case. The client was extremely satisfied with the positive outcome achieved.
In re Rowe., et al (CPS REFERRAL/INVESTIGATION CLOSED AND DISMISSED): The mother of two children was under investigation by Child Protective Services (CPS) for allegations of child abuse, domestic violence, and substance abuse. CPS was preparing to file a petition with the court and potentially remove her children from her custody. However, the mother engaged Walter Shaw of Shaw 3 Law Firm for legal representation and guidance during the CPS investigation. Mr. Shaw promptly intervened, and within a few weeks, the investigation was concluded and the referral was closed, resulting in the cessation of CPS oversight.
In re A.B: (Physical Abuse Allegation (WIC 300(a): Dismissed/Found Not True) Client, Ms. Claire, faced false accusations of physical abuse against her children, leading to their removal by CPS. Seeking justice, Ms. Claire engaged Shaw 3 Law Firm to contest these unfounded claims. Attorney Walter Shaw took on the case, setting it for trial and vigorously defending Ms. Claire. Following extensive litigation, the allegations of physical abuse were dismissed. Ms. Claire was relieved and satisfied with the favorable outcome, which cleared her name.
In re C.W: (Untreated Mental Health Allegation (WIC 300(b): (Dismissed/Found Not True): DCFS accused the client of having untreated mental health issues, specifically anxiety and depression, which were alleged to significantly impact the physical and emotional well-being of her child. The client disputed these claims, asserting that her mental health did not affect her ability to care for her child. She engaged Shaw 3 Law Firm for assistance in contesting the allegations. Attorney Walter Shaw took on the case, negotiating and litigating vigorously on her behalf. Ultimately, the allegations of untreated mental health issues were dismissed, with no evidence supporting harm to the child’s physical or emotional health. The client regained custody of her child, and the case was subsequently dismissed and closed. The client was very satisfied with the outcome.
In re E.J: (388 Motion for unsupervised visitation, overnights and weekends GRANTED): The father in this case had been restricted to supervised visitation despite completing his case plan as required by CFS and showing significant progress from the services provided. However, CFS did not adjust his visitation to facilitate reunification. Attorney Walter Shaw took over the case, thoroughly reviewing the situation and identifying a strong potential for obtaining more favorable visitation terms. Mr. Shaw filed a 388 Petition Motion, demonstrating to the court that changed circumstances warranted increased visitation. His motion highlighted the father’s consistent and high-quality visitation as well as his adherence to the case plan, arguing that liberalized visitation was in the child’s best interest. The judge concurred with Mr. Shaw’s assessment, granting the motion and awarding the father unsupervised visitation, including overnights and weekends. Eventually, the child was fully returned to the father’s care, and the case was dismissed and closed.
In re J.D: (CPS Case Closed): The client, a biological father of two children, is a social media influencer in the medical field based in Southern California. Following some unwarranted referrals to DCFS, fueled by negative reactions to his social media posts about his children, the client faced significant challenges. Attorney Walter Shaw took on the case and successfully addressed the issue. Through effective resolution, Mr. Shaw led to the dismissal of the DCFS case and obtained a favorable Family Law Order. The client was ultimately relieved and pleased with the positive outcome.
In re R.S: (De Facto Status Motion Granted): The client, the Maternal Great-Grandmother (MGGM) of the child involved in the DCFS case, had been providing financial, emotional, and physical support for the child. Despite her significant role, she had no formal rights or involvement in the DCFS case. Seeking to change this, the client engaged Attorney Walter Shaw and his firm for assistance. Mr. Shaw thoroughly reviewed the case and filed a De Facto Parent Status Motion, supported by strong legal arguments and evidence. The judge approved the motion, officially granting the client De Facto Parent Status and making her an involved party in the case. The client was thrilled with the outcome and the newfound recognition of her role.
In re L.J (Motion to reopen the case and terminate legal guardianship and for the client to get reunification services GRANTED): Client is the biological mother of three kids. Her CPS case closed granting legal guardianship to her relative. After the case closed, the client circumstances has changed where she was engaged in new services and no longer in a toxic relationship affecting her children lives. A motion was filed on her behalf and Mr. Shaw argued the case for her. The court heard arguments and granted the motion to reopen the case and give mother a chance to reunify with her children. A success story where the client gets a 2nd chance to get her kids back.
In re Everett W., et al: (INTENTIONAL PHYSICAL ABUSE ALLEGATION DISMISSED): The client was falsely accused of “Intentional Physical Abuse” of her son by CPS. The CPS alleged that the client (mother) intentionally and physically abused her child causing her child to suffer an injury on his forehead. Mr. Shaw came onto the case to fight the FALSE ALLEGATION against the client (mother). Mr. Shaw was able to argue and show that the DIRECT CAUSE of the child’s injuries was not caused nor was there a causal connection between the client’s conduct and the child’s injury. The end result was the “Intentional Physical Abuse” allegation was outright DISMISSED!
In re Casey W. (Mother reunified with all of her children): The client, the biological mother of two children, faced involvement from CPS following accusations of substance abuse, mental health concerns, and an allegation that her child tested positive for fentanyl. The client maintained that these issues were not reflective of her current situation and that any past conduct was no longer relevant. Despite this, CPS decided to remove her children from her care. Attorney Walter Shaw took on the case, advocating vigorously on behalf of the client. Through diligent litigation, Mr. Shaw successfully secured the reunification of the mother with her children, restoring them to her care and custody. The client was extremely pleased with the favorable outcome and the return of her children.
In re Aalyah J.: (History of Substance Abuse allegation dismissed and the overall CPS case closed): The client, the biological mother of her daughter, faced several allegations from CPS, notably including a claim of a ‘History of Substance Abuse.’ The client firmly believed these allegations were false. Attorney Walter Shaw took on the case and vigorously defended the client. Mr. Shaw successfully had the ‘History of Substance Abuse’ allegation dismissed and also managed to have the entire CPS case dismissed and closed.
In re Dia’Lonie B: (The client successfully reunified with her daughter leading to the CPS closing the case with the client getting sole legal and sole physical custody): The client, the biological mother of the child, was subject to a Children Protective Services (CPS) referral following allegations of a physical altercation with a family member in front of her daughter. CPS also accused the client of drug abuse and a mental breakdown impacting her daughter’s well-being. Attorney Walter Shaw of Shaw 3 Law Firm took on the case and successfully litigated on the client’s behalf. As a result, the client was reunited with her daughter, and CPS closed the case with a family law order granting her sole legal and sole physical custody. The client was extremely pleased with the outcome.
In re H.E., et al: (Allegations dismissed and Permanent Restraining Order Granted): The client, the biological mother of two children, faced multiple accusations from Children Protective Services (CPS), including: 1) a history of domestic violence with the father; 2) substance abuse, including methamphetamine; 3) mental health issues such as anxiety and depression; 4) a criminal record involving DUI and domestic violence; and 5) a prior child welfare case. The client contested three of these allegations and sought to protect herself by obtaining a restraining order against the father. Attorney Walter Shaw from Shaw 3 Law Firm took on the case, successfully having three of the five allegations dismissed and securing the restraining order. The client was extremely satisfied with the favorable resolution of her case.
In re Amyssa A., (Parental Rights NOT TERMINATED with the CFS case closing): The client is the biological mother of her two (2) children in the CFS case. After the case been open for at or around 2-3 years, Mr. Shaw from Shaw 3 Law Firm came onto the case. The court hearing was a Welfare Institute Code (WIC) 366.26 Hearing. A 366.26 hearing is where the judge decides to terminate a parent’s parental rights or not terminate the parent’s parental rights. Mr. Shaw litigated for the client to keep her parental rights to her children. At the end of the hearing, the judge DID NOT TERMINATE THE CLIENT’S PARENTAL RIGHTS. The judge closed the CFS case. The client was extremely happy of the results that she got to keep her parental rights.
In re Kiera T. et al., (The children was successfully returned to the mother/client’s care and custody): The client is the biological mother of her two (2) children in her Children and Family Services (CFS) case. The case opened because of the mother having a history of substance abuse, history of mental health, thus overall placing her children at a risk of harm. The judge found the allegations true against the mother and her children was taken from her care and custody. The client was scared and did not know what to do to get her children back under her care. Walter Shaw from Shaw 3 Law Firm came onto the case. Mr. Shaw informed the client what she needed to do, so Mr. Shaw can fight to get her children back under her care and custody. After months of fighting aggressively with CFS, Mr. Shaw was successfully able to get the client’s children back under her care and custody. The client is very happy in getting her children back under her care and custody.
In re Goulet (CPS Referral Investigation Closed): Client is the biological mother of her son in the case. CPS received a referral from the client’s son reporting allegation of the mother slapping the father to the therapist. The therapist reported to CPS. CPS took the referral and conducted a CPS Investigation. Client did not know what to do and retained a California CPS Defense Lawyer on her case. Walter Shaw from Shaw 3 Law Firm came onto the case to assist with Pre-filing representation. Mr. Shaw reached out to CPS to resolve the CPS case and to have the CPS investigation on the client closed. After weeks of going back and forth, the client’s CPS investigation was closed and allegation was determined to be unfounded. The client was happy with the results.